Posts Tagged ‘watched’

Finally Saw The Road

Saturday, December 19th, 2009

I finally got to see The Road today, and it was well worth the wait. I won’t bother with a full review, just my own quick thoughts.

I started a re-read of the book on Wednesday, and literally finished it sitting in the theater, minutes before the movie started. So, I was able to appreciate how faithful the movie is to the book, and at the same time to notice what they moved around or added. One obvious addition, watching a gang hunt down a fleeing young woman and child, must have been a replacement for the baby scene, since it fell in at about the right spot. But basically, it stuck very close to the book, with much of the dialog straight from the novel.

It was great to be able to really see what I’ve been visualizing all this time, and it did pretty much jive with the way it looked in my head, but it was even bleaker than I had pictured. I guess I never really realized just how much ash was everywhere and how bare the trees were. From now on, whenever I read the book, I’ll definitely be imagining the look from the movie.

One thing seeing it on screen made me realize is that I would have preferred a slightly different ending. Watching the final scene made me think it was a bit contrived. If I had a vote, I would have liked to see The Boy shoulder his pack and continue his trek down the road on his own.

But overall, I loved it. What was straight from the book was done well, and what was added wasn’t jarring. I’ll definitely be checking it out again in the theater, and can’t wait for the blu-ray, and hopefully an extended cut.

Is Zombieland Really a Zombie Movie?

Friday, November 20th, 2009

So apparently someone was nice enough to let their good friend, The Internet, borrow their full DVD quality rip of Zombieland, and then The Internet passed it on to me. And I’m glad they did, because it’s a great flick, though I don’t recall liking it as much a I did Shaun of the Dead, which it’s often compared to.

I loved the post-apocalypticness of it, with all the scenes of the abandoned towns, and the little tibits thrown in like the plane crashed on the freeway. And it was definitely funny; I’m going to have to watch it a few more times to make sure I catch all the one-liners (“You’ve got a pretty mouth, Boy!” was one good one) Well worth watching and I’m looking forward to the inevitable sequel.

But what I was wondering is what the true zombie fans out there think of it. Not about the movie itself, ’cause I’m sure most of them will like it as much as I did, but about whether or not it’s really a zombie movie at all. I remember after 28 Days Later, there was an outcry from the true zombie fanatics that unless they were dead, they weren’t zombies. “The Infected” were cool and all, but don’t try to call them zombies, because they just weren’t.

So in Zombieland, the only explanation I heard was along the lines of “it’s a virus which causes the brain to swell, gives you a high fever, and the desire to eat flesh”. And they didn’t seem to be worried about the traditional headshot rule, which all adds up to infected, but not zombies.

Overall, it doesn’t matter, it’s a great movie, but the purists might have an opinion on the matter, and I doubt they’d be shy to share it if you asked them.

Sandmen Don’t Run! – Watched Logan’s Run

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

Logan’s Run has always been one of my favorite movies. It’s probably one of the first, if not the first, post-apocalyptic movies I ever saw, and helped to launch my love of all things post-apocalyptic. But even so, I can understand why there are many people who consider it to be one of the worst movies ever made. Yes, the special effects are horrible, the acting is bad, the sets would look at home in a movie 20 years older, and many parts of the story make you go “huh?” (like what purpose did the Box segment serve?).

But for those of us who grew up with Logan 5 and Jessica 6, none of that matters; Logan’s Run is pure nostalgia and logic will not come between us and our fond memories of this great movie. I’d guess probably 95% of those reading this have seen it, and those of us over 35 or so, give it higher ratings than the younger set. If you’re a fan, you’ll agree with what I say, and if you’ve always been a bit cool toward it, I won’t be able to change your mind by pointing out any stellar examples of film-making that you might have missed.

If for some reason you haven’t seen Logan’s Run yet, then you really should. It deserves respect for being a pillar of the post-apocalyptic genre in film, if not for it’s technical merits.

Regarding the blu-ray specifically, picture quaility looked fine, but didn’t strike me as especially clear. I have a 52″ LCD, and when I looked at it up close, I could really see the graininess or noise I associate with an over-sharpened image. I believe the bonus features are the same as are on the DVD; just the theatrical trailer, commentary and a short featurette about the making of the film. So if you already have the DVD, the blu-ray might not be that much of an upgrade.

Repent! The End is Extremely Fucking Nigh – Watched 28 Days Later

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

Probably 90% of you, faithful readers, have seen 28 Days Later and have already made up your own minds about it, but the other 10% of you, read on.

28 Days Later is a great movie; I love everything about it, from the way the tone is set by the music and camera work, to the subject matter itself. And let me get something out of the way early. I know some of you are just itching to pounce on that “Comment” link the instant I say 28 Days Later is a zombie movie.

Well, you can relax that clicker finger, because I clearly understand the difference between a true zombie story and the kind of story told in 28 Days Later, and please don’t hate me, but I prefer the “infected” to true zombies. In my mind, true zombies are monsters, in the same vein as vampires, werewolves, and other supernatural creatures. The fact that they’re dead, but still walking around means they’re more properly classified as fantasy than science fiction.

Don’t get me wrong, when zombies and post-apocalypses overlap, I’m all for it, but I prefer stories that are grounded in reality or scientifically reasonable, and that leads to the twist on the traditional zombie story that 28 Days Later is such a great example of.

The movie starts with kind of an homage to Day of the Triffids. The main character wakes up in a deserted hospital, oblivious to the disaster that has happened around him in the last 28 days. He runs into two other survivors who clue him into the fact that an epidemic has devastated the country, causing the infected to turn into mindless killing machines, overcome with pure simple rage.

We then follow our survivors as they try to escape the city, and find some remnant of government or military authority who can protect them. Unfortunately for them, there are many different kinds of threats, and being safe from one, doesn’t mean safe from the others.

A lot of the movie takes place out in the countryside, so there’s not as much post-apocalyptic London as I would have liked, but we do get a taste of it. And the action and the storyline more than make up for it.

So overall, I’ve probably watched it five or so times now, but it’s one of those movies I can watch again and again. If you haven’t seen it yet, it’s definitely worth it.

Watched Glen and Randa

Monday, October 26th, 2009

A few weeks ago, I was inspired by this post on the Post Apocalyptic Movie Mania blog to move Glen and Randa a little higher up on my Netflix queue. It took a few weeks for me to get to it, but it finally arrived, and I watched it tonight.

Aside from a few mentions of nudity, I had really no idea what the movie was about. It turns out that it does start with our two main characters (yup, you guessed it, Glen and Randa) stark naked for the first ten minutes. (And boy, is Randa hot in a 70s all natural top and bottom kind of way.) But after that, there’s not much that I would consider even R-rated, so I’m not sure where the idea of it being porn came from. Maybe they were just more prudish back then. (Edit: Huh, my bad, apparently it really was rated X when it was originally released in 1971)

But even though Randa remained mostly fully clothed for the rest of the movie, I still really liked it. It’s basically the story of Glen and Randa traveling across a post-apocalyptic countryside in search of a mostly-mythical city. The trailer says “20 years after the bomb” but they must have been whoppers because there’s now an ocean in Idaho.

This is not a mohawked-motorcycle-mauraders kind of movie. In fact, there are no mauraders, or even any violence, at all (unless you count the clubbing deaths of a few innocent fish). The point of the movie isn’t their physical fight to survive, it’s more about the innocence and naivete of the characters and how they live in this time.

Wow, I just took a look at IMDB, and it’s running a 2.1 (out of 10) rating. I would have given it something more in the 5-6 range, maybe even a 7. Overall, I liked it, and I’m glad I watched it, but I wouldn’t buy the DVD, and I probably won’t ever watch it again (unless it miraculously shows up on Blu-Ray, then I’d have to add it to my collection.)

But if you’re reading this, then you’re most likely a fan of the genre, so if you can handle a more thoughtful post-apocalypse, then check this one out. If you don’t want to buy it, it’s worth a queue-add.

Final bit of trivia: The stars of the movie, Steven Curry and Shelley Plimpton, first worked together in the original Broadway production of the rock musical Hair, so I guess they were already used to running around naked in front of an audience.

Update: I take back what I said about never watching it again. I bought the DVD, just to have it as part of my collection. It’s a worthwhile addition.

“Neville! Come out, Neville!” – Watched The Omega Man

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

I finally joined the 21st century, and bought a Blu-Ray player this past weekend, so over the last few days I’ve been on the lookout for worthwhile post-apocalyptic movies in that format. So far I’ve picked up 12 Monkeys, The Road Warrior, Wall-E, and The Omega Man, and tonight, I decided to give the Charlton Heston version of the last man on Earth story a try.

I had seen Omega Man before, but it’s been years, and I didn’t remember much about it other than the fact that it was the second movie version of Richard Matheson’s novel, I Am Legend. The first interpretation on film was The Last Man On Earth starring Vincent Price (which has fallen out of copyright and into the public domain). That version was fairly faithful to the book in terms of the dynamic between the main character, Robert Neville, and the group that was out to kill him, the cause of the world-wide plague that wiped out civilization, and the fact that the “survivors” were actual vampires.

The Charlton Heston version tweaks the story just a tad to make the plague the result of biological weapons used in a war between China and Russia, and other than an aversion to light, the surviving victims of the plague aren’t vampiritic, just very pale and very crazy. Believing himself to be the last unaffected human on Earth, our hero drives around Los Angeles by day, hunting for the hidden “nest” of the Family, a cult-like group who dresses in robes and shuns modern technology for causing the downfall of Man. But when the sun goes down, the Family is free to roam the city, harassing Neville in his fortified apartment.

There are lots of cool scenes of Neville cruising around a deserted LA; grabbing new clothes as he needs them, swapping out his car when he gets a flat tire, and even firing up a generator to watch a movie in an otherwise empty theater. Those aspects mostly made up for the rest of the plot, which was a little thin. They never explained how the plague, or the madness it seemed to invoke, worked, and why it affected people differently, killing some outright, turning others into members of the Family, and leaving others apparently unscathed.

But if you can overlook a few vagaries, then the rest of the movie is good old-fashioned 1970s post-apocalyptic fun, and luckily it’s available for free via Netflix streaming, so it won’t even cost you anything to watch it (if you’ve got an account, of course).

The Omega Man is one of what’s considered to be a trilogy of sorts of post-apocalyptic’ish films starring Heston, the other two being Planet of the Apes and Soylent Green, both of which I’m now in the mood to watch. There’s a Planet of the Apes 40th Anniversary Collection box set with my name on it, waiting for an extra $100 to spare, but Soylent Green isn’t on Blu-Ray yet, so I’m going to watch that one the old-fashioned way, via torrent download.

Watched The Ultimate Warrior

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

I was listening to episode 22 of the Destructomundo Podcast, Anarchy, the other day, and they made reference to a post-apocalyptic movie I had never heard of before, The Ultimate Warrior. I did some checking, and even though it is available on DVD (as a combo disk with Battle Beneath the Earth) it’s not on Netflx or the torrents. So I shelled out the cash to buy it on Ebay, and it arrived today.

Released in 1975 and starring Yul Brynner, The Ultimate Warrior is the earliest example I can recall of a PA scenario with a traveling hero figure who is enlisted to protect a group of survivors, a la Mad Max 2 from several years later.

The film takes place in New York City, just about 30 years after a series of plagues and crop diseases reduces civilization to scattered communities, each struggling to resist succumbing to hunger, and/or the groups of marauders intent on getting hold of their resources. One such commune hires Carson, Brynner’s character, to serve as their fighter and drive off any attacks.

I was surprised at how violent the movie was; not that the times it portrays would be less dangerous, on the contrary of course, but the body count just kept piling up. There were more stabbings than I could count, multiple throat cuttings, a garroting, one mob murder, a few heads bashed with rocks, two men purposefully thrown off buildings, one face pressed into a cooking fire, etc.

On the whole, I enjoyed it, and am glad I spent the money to be able to see it. It doesn’t rise to the level of the more well known 70s PA entries (Omega Man, Planet of the Apes, Soylent Green, Logan’s Run) but I did like it more than I liked A Boy and His Dog. (Though I do have to wonder why every film maker from the 70s assumes that bell-bottoms and hippie hair-dos will remain the prevailing fashion through the collapse of the world as we know it.)

If you’re reading this, you’re obviously a fan of the post-apocalypse, so if this one drops into your lap, it’s well worth the time it takes to watch it.

Watched O-bi, O-ba – Koniec cywilizacji

Friday, June 26th, 2009

O-bi, O-ba – Koniec cywilizacji is one of those foreign language post-apocalyptic films I discovered on the IMDB list of post-apocalytic media.  (I think it’s Polish, but I’m not sure.) I couldn’t download it, so I picked up a copy of the DVD on Ebay.  It cost less than $10 delivered, so I’m not sorry I bought it, but the movie was just ok.

It takes place one year after a nuclear war forces approximately 2000 survivors into a series of undergound bunkers, protected by some kind of dome that keeps out the fallout and nuclear winter.  To give the people hope, those in charge spread the story of the Ark, a space ship kind of thing that will come and take everyone off of Earth to safety.

The look and feel of the film was great; the bunker they lived in was totally believable.  There was lots of concrete and brick, and dripping exposed pipe.  But overall the movie was just too strange for me.  All of the characters were more or less insane, and the fact that everyone was looking forward to being rescued by the Ark, and going to live in space wasn’t very believable.

So if you happen to acquire a copy of it, it’s watchable, but I woudn’t spend the time looking for it.

Watched Письма мёртвого человека (Dead Man’s Letters)

Saturday, June 13th, 2009

I was browsing the Internet Movie DataBase the other day, and noticed they had a list of media with a keyword of “post-apocalyptic”.  I filtered it by “movie”and started scanning the list until I got to one I didn’t recognize, Pisma myortvogo cheloveka from 1986 (Dead Man’s Letters, or Letters from a Dead Man in English).  I’ve mentioned a couple times recently that I’m interested in non-American post-apocalyptic stories, so the prospect of a undiscovered, highly-rated, foreign-language PA movie really grabbed my attention.

I took a look at Ebay, but only found a region 2 DVD available, so headed off to torrentz.com to find it.  I went for the larger of the two versions I found, and it took over a week for it to come down.  Luckily, it’s a DVD .iso, so it’s complete with the English subtitles.

I finally got to watch it tonight, and it’s hard to put into words how I felt about it.  I mean I loved it, but at the same time, it was such a downer, I can’t say I felt good while watching it.  I saw a forum post that called this “the Russian Threads” and in some regards, they’re right.  This movie is just as depressing, and has the same lack of any kind of positive overtones. But it goes even further than Threads in that it’s filmed in a kind of sepia-colored grainy black and white that totally matches the settings.

There appears to be some debate about where the movie is supposed to take place.  I’ve seen forum posters say Russia, an Eastern European country, and even the United States.  I assumed it was Russia, but the characters did use several Christian references, and there was even a priest character, which I thought was strange given our stereotype of the “Godless communists”.   It takes place an undetermined time, probably several months, after a nuclear war, which is started by accident.  The survivors live in the basements and lower levels of buildings, while outside on the surface is nothing but utter devastation; destroyed and collapsed buildings, ash and dust.

For the length of the film, we get to watch the main character, a Nobel Prize winning scientist, and a few colleagues slowly die, whether from war-related causes or by their own hands, or abandon each other to their fates, while we’re told that only the young and strong are allowed to go to the “central bunker” where the plan is to stay underground for 30 years.  Our characters are neither, so we never see the inside of that bunker.

Some have said that the final scene offers a glimmer of hope, but given how the rest of the events in the story went, I wouldn’t be too hopeful of a good outcome.  (Though now that I think about it, there was a voiceover that suggested a certain outcome. I may have to watch that part again.) But in any case, if you’re a fan of the genre, you have to try to track this one down.  The acting was great, and the settings themselves were awesome.  I can’t recall seeing a more devastated cityscape in a movie before.

One final note about something I found interesting.  In the final credits, there’s a note that says “Thanks to the Committee of Soviet Scientists for Peace Against Nuclear Threat.”  I did some Googling, and apparently that group put out a book called The Night After–: Climatic and Biological Consequences of a Nuclear War: Scientists’ Warning in 1983.  I suppose the film makers used their descriptions of what the effects of a war would be in their planning.  And I found it interesting that while we (Americans) stereotypically supposed the Russians wanted nothing more than to nuke all of us Yankees to dust, there was actually a group in their own society who campaigned against that possibility.

ps  I’m not sure if my download was bad or what, but twice in the movie it just skipped forward about five minutes.  I didn’t realize at first that I could rewind back to the skipped over minutes.  So if you download it and think you’re missing something, try rewinding to check.  I almost missed the scene of the bombs falling, which was done really well.

Watched Damnation Alley

Monday, June 1st, 2009

I was browsing through my Netflix Watch Instantly queue and couldn’t find anything I really felt like watching, so I decided to give Amazon’s Video on Demand service a try on my Roku.  The ordering process turned out to be totally painless.  I don’t recall connecting my Roku to my Amzon account, but I must have done so back when the service first came out.  I just browsed Amazon for a video I wanted to watch, paid for it, and then it appeared in the Amazon “My Library” menu on the Roku.

Unfortunately, the first movie I chose to watch was Ill Generation.  I suppose it’s an accomplishment to complete a full-length film on practically no budget, but in this case I had to wonder why they even bothered.  Granted I only gave it about 10 minutes, but I couldn’t handle anymore.  I only lost $3 on the deal.

Since it was still early I decided to give it another try and ordered a rental of Damnation Alley for $4.  I didn’t realize it at the time, but this movie has never been relesed on DVD, so the only way you could watch it until recently was on TV, VHS, or downloading the torrent, that is until it was added to Amazon just a week or so ago.  Again, after I paid for it, it instantly appeared on my Roku, and the quality was great.  I had forgotten how cheesy the movie was, but how can you not like a movie with killer armor-plated cockroaches?

Interestingly, I had always thought (or mis-remembered actually) that the Landmaster vehicle in Damnation Alley was the same vehicle as was in Ark II, the Saturday morning live-action show from the 70’s about a group of scientists traveling around a post-apocalyptic landscape.  Turns out the trucks were completely different, both made specifically for their shows.

And speaking of Ark II, I hadn’t noticed that the entire series of 15 episodes is available on DVD.  I’m going to go ahead and Netflix them.  Not sure if I’ll watch them right away, but will at least make copies and send them back.

They’ll go along great with my Captain Power and the Soldiers of the Future DVDs that I haven’t gotten around to watching yet.